View Single Post
  #16  
Old 03-29-2011, 03:21 PM
mrkartoom's Avatar
mrkartoom mrkartoom is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: western mass
Posts: 349
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrentMartell View Post
LMAO. Yes, yes indeed. They are low low low quality compared to what is stock on most bikes today. I am not brand loyal to KTM but the quality of a WP is far superior to this crap. Pathetic valving specs, specs that are not used by any other fork manfacturer, and of course the fact several have come with QC issue's that should have been addressed at the factory.

OK, dead horse is beat to death again. I have 700ish miles and the fake coating is still intact on the forks for now. I pray it stays on.

I do think once I get the rebound dampening issue solved the forks are going to be good.
The more I read about these forks the more I understand why the people I talked to pushed me towards a Sachs-equipped model. They didn't say low quality but used the term "basic". I'm sure the Sachs units have issues as well, but you guys are making me feel better about the decision.
__________________
2011 Gas Gas EC300 38mm, 2008 Husky TE610, 2003 Beta Rev3 250