Rieju & GasGas Legacy Riders Club Forum  

Go Back   Rieju & GasGas Legacy Riders Club Forum > GasGas Enduro Technical Forums > Enduro Suspension

Enduro Suspension Tuning & maintenance of Enduro forks, shocks, etc


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-29-2010, 11:09 PM
bergerhag's Avatar
bergerhag bergerhag is offline
Gold Level Site Supporter
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Timr?, Sweden
Posts: 675
Default 2010 Sachs fork factory compression stack specs(ec300)

ok, now I have investigated the factory settings of the fork. I was surprised to find 140mm oil level, and a light 2-stage compression stack.

Stack:
24x.15
12x.15
20x.15
16x.15
14x.15
12x.15
10x.30
10x.30

comp piston has two large channels for the compression flow, with two 1 mm-bleed holes.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg sachscompstack.jpg (74.6 KB, 73 views)


Reply With Quote


  #2  
Old 06-30-2010, 12:48 AM
pedroec300 pedroec300 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sydney,Australia
Posts: 7
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bergerhag View Post
ok, now I have investigated the factory settings of the fork. I was surprised to find 140mm oil level, and a light 2-stage compression stack.

Stack:
24x.15
12x.15
20x.15
16x.15
14x.15
12x.15
10x.30
10x.30

comp piston has two large channels for the compression flow, with two 1 mm-bleed holes.
So what does that tell you about the forks action?
I have the 2010 450 and have only ridden it once
so the forks need more running in.
I found them not to bad,a little bit firm in the mid stroke.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-30-2010, 01:33 AM
bergerhag's Avatar
bergerhag bergerhag is offline
Gold Level Site Supporter
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Timr?, Sweden
Posts: 675
Default

Forks feel terrible on small stuff. Harsh on roots and the like. However I have identified a misalignment/sticktion problem, but have not had the opportunity to test it with problem solved.

It should perform very good for the type of rocky riding i mostly do. We'll know by this evening.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-30-2010, 01:48 AM
pedroec300 pedroec300 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sydney,Australia
Posts: 7
Default

Sounds good please let us know how you went.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-30-2010, 06:41 AM
twowheels's Avatar
twowheels twowheels is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Dearborn MI
Posts: 1,860
Default

It must be the moon rocks in Sweden, because the stock EC (250/300) forks feel pretty decent on small stuff in Michigan. Not so much on the slap downs, but overall really good for out of the box legs.

HOWEVER - check the forks carefully and take action on this - I found the 1.0mm thick spring spacer ring on the top of the spring cracked and coned. The springs have very little pre-load to begin with so my plan was to replace the original with a 3.0mm spacer, but if this had completely broken it would have been catastrophic.

The forks look good as far as construction goes, but with some odd-dimensioned components, but the work to modify the compression tap and valve stack for increased tuneability continues.
__________________
Steven Beane #275
PlusOnePerformance - Superior Service the World Over - Dearborn MI
AMA District 14 (Michigan) Officer

afterhourscycle.com
Michigan's Beta and TM Race Headquarters
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-30-2010, 12:25 PM
moto9's Avatar
moto9 moto9 is offline
Silver Level Site Supporter
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 367
Default

The base valve is only part of the problem.
The mid- valve, spring rates and rebound come into play in making the Sachs and Marz for work.
I finally got my forks working great after a re-spring and several valving adjustments to all three areas.
Just a note I am using 3w oil with 130mm oil level
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-30-2010, 09:17 PM
moto9's Avatar
moto9 moto9 is offline
Silver Level Site Supporter
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 367
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by twowheels View Post
It must be the moon rocks in Sweden, because the stock EC (250/300) forks feel pretty decent on small stuff in Michigan. Not so much on the slap downs, but overall really good for out of the box legs.

HOWEVER - check the forks carefully and take action on this - I found the 1.0mm thick spring spacer ring on the top of the spring cracked and coned. The springs have very little pre-load to begin with so my plan was to replace the original with a 3.0mm spacer, but if this had completely broken it would have been catastrophic.

The forks look good as far as construction goes, but with some odd-dimensioned components, but the work to modify the compression tap and valve stack for increased tuneability continues.
One thing I don't like about the Sachs fork is the rod stopper is peened into position.
The Marz fork has a removable one, that allows removal and thus the rod can be removed to access the rebound and mid-valve piston/stack.
Looks like on the Sachs you have to remove the cart head which requires a special cart body holding tool and some heat to split the two apart.
Anyone who has had one apart care to comment on that ??
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-30-2010, 09:23 PM
twowheels's Avatar
twowheels twowheels is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Dearborn MI
Posts: 1,860
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by moto9 View Post
Looks like on the Sachs you have to remove the cart head which requires a special cart body holding tool and some heat to split the two apart.
Anyone who has had one apart care to comment on that ??
Prints are in the shop to have the tool made - you're right that that is the only way it comes apart.
__________________
Steven Beane #275
PlusOnePerformance - Superior Service the World Over - Dearborn MI
AMA District 14 (Michigan) Officer

afterhourscycle.com
Michigan's Beta and TM Race Headquarters
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-01-2010, 01:27 AM
bergerhag's Avatar
bergerhag bergerhag is offline
Gold Level Site Supporter
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Timr?, Sweden
Posts: 675
Default

Ok, suspension is getting better.

Here's my setup: (115kg in gear)

Front:
Spring: 4.5 N/mm, std preload(next to nothing)
Oil level: 140mm, stock oil. (what weight is it?)
rebound clicks: 11 out
comp clicks: 8 out

rear:
Spring: 60 N/mm, 8 mm preload
Rebound clicks: 4 out
low comp(center adjuster): 3 out
high comp(big knob): 6 out

With this setup it has got a really stable and planted feel going fast over choppy ground. However, as testing progressed in the heavy rain, the bike again got that harsh fork action. My thinking is that I am coming down too far in the stroke, a soaking wet rider does tend to weigh a little more than a dry one, and also the mud buildup added to this?

Any thoughts on this? Stiffer springs or more preload?

Last edited by bergerhag; 07-01-2010 at 01:33 AM. Reason: mistype on comp clicks
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-01-2010, 11:18 PM
moto9's Avatar
moto9 moto9 is offline
Silver Level Site Supporter
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 367
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bergerhag View Post
Ok, suspension is getting better.

Here's my setup: (115kg in gear)

Front:
Spring: 4.5 N/mm, std preload(next to nothing)
Oil level: 140mm, stock oil. (what weight is it?)
rebound clicks: 11 out
comp clicks: 8 out

rear:
Spring: 60 N/mm, 8 mm preload
Rebound clicks: 4 out
low comp(center adjuster): 3 out
high comp(big knob): 6 out

With this setup it has got a really stable and planted feel going fast over choppy ground. However, as testing progressed in the heavy rain, the bike again got that harsh fork action. My thinking is that I am coming down too far in the stroke, a soaking wet rider does tend to weigh a little more than a dry one, and also the mud buildup added to this?

Any thoughts on this? Stiffer springs or more preload?
Another thought, is a reduction in speed...as you slow the ride gets rougher.

Here's what I found:
The fork is over damped on the BV and MV for trail riding, it's under damped on the rebound side and IMHO it's under sprung.
I went to stiffer springs because the fork and shock was riding too low in the stroke, and heavier springs meant I needed to stiffen up the rebound side...more so in the HS portion of the stack.
on the BV I did use a bleed shim, but very slight bleed. The MV I had to re-adjust several times until I was happy with how deep the fork dipped into the stroke.
MY first attempt was way too much float...it worked great every where except in fast down hills that had holes, large roots, and G-outs then it became a scary as the fork would dive too deep into the stroke too quickly.
By the 3rd attempt I found an arrangement that gave me the best ride yet,....super plush yet compliant and I now can attack down hills without fear of going over the bars.
I think there's a lot of magic to be found in the MV...of course it all has to work together.
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2010 Sachs Fork Seals Bradz Enduro Suspension 7 01-04-2011 12:06 PM
2010 sachs forks bowtech Enduro Product Announcements 13 09-09-2010 07:50 AM
2010 Sachs EC300 Fork Problem Bradz Enduro Suspension 4 07-17-2010 03:21 PM
Sachs shock compression adjuster? SpeedyManiac Enduro Suspension 2 03-26-2010 02:13 PM
09 EC300R Fork Compression re-valving Keg Enduro Suspension 10 03-29-2009 07:17 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2009 - GasGasRider.org