Rieju & GasGas Legacy Riders Club Forum  

Go Back   Rieju & GasGas Legacy Riders Club Forum > GasGas Enduro Technical Forums > Enduro Electrical & Wiring

Enduro Electrical & Wiring Lighting, Ignition, Wiring, Plugs, etc.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-13-2015, 09:16 PM
Zman's Avatar
Zman Zman is offline
Platinum Level Site Supporter
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Burbs of Chicago
Posts: 1,818
Default CDI options

I was playing with some different CDI units on our 2004 DE300 and my 2000 XC327 big bore. Both bikes had the original CDI units with black heat shrink. The one on the 2000 was the older box shaped style.

I tried a 2011 250 Six Day dual map on the 2004 and while the dual map button made a minor difference between settings, both settings were considerably more pipey than the original CDI and it put a noticeable hit at about 2/3 up the power band. It also added a little more high rpm over rev. It gave it more of a MX power band that would be fun for open fast tiding but would be a bit too much in tight woods.

My 2000 327 has always had a super linear power band that I could lug like a 4 stroke enduro bike. While it had great power down low and through the mid range and a modest top end, it signed off about 1000 rpm sooner than the 2004 DE300.

I had two CDI options to try on the 327, a blue heat shrink CU7490 and a yellow CU7460 off a 125. I tried the yellow first. I was really surprised how big of an impact it had on the overall power band. The power came on a lot harder just above idle, pulled very strong through the mid range and it added a MX like hit in about 2/3 up the power band. It gained about a 1000 rpm on the top end and revs similar to the 300 with the dual map Six day CDI.

On the down side the yellow version had a negative impact on the low rpm luggability. It seemed to stall easier where it was very difficult to stall previously and it was hard to modulate the power as it came on hard and fast so it spun to easily in technical wet hills.

Later I tried the blue version and it seemed to be a nice mix of my old CDI bottom end power and still has the gained a bit of a hit in the upper rpm and it gained the extra high rpm over rev it never had before.

I think this is going to be a bonus for the Michelin tire company.

One more thought, those old stock black heat shrink CDI units could help out the guys looking to tame their 300s.


Reply With Quote


  #2  
Old 10-11-2015, 03:43 AM
motopsycho87 motopsycho87 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Suffolk, UK
Posts: 905
Default

Never seen those part numbers before? Got any links or care to elaborate? Check my posts for success with RM125 CDI

I also have a KTM 250SX CDI to try when I'm bothered
__________________
2006 EC300 Enduro - Ignitech CDI - 38/NECW#2/165 FMF gnarly, FMF shorty, .50 front 5.7 rear

2016 RM-Z450
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-11-2015, 05:48 AM
Jakobi's Avatar
Jakobi Jakobi is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,994
Default

My 2010 engine and 2013 engines are setup very similarly in terms of cylinder height and head modification but run very differently with the same jetting and gearing.

I haven't mapped the cylinder ports, or compared pipe shape/volume to any extent, however one has a Kokusan CDI and the other a JDRacing Italian model (from memory). I wouldn't be surprised if they have different maps.

Also, TSP has been using programmable CDIs on the Ktm 2T ranges and finding significant gains in power across the rev range simply by tuning the ignition map. Something that's often overlooked I think.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-11-2015, 08:26 PM
Zman's Avatar
Zman Zman is offline
Platinum Level Site Supporter
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Burbs of Chicago
Posts: 1,818
Default

Those part numbers came off the KOKUSAN CDI unit.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-12-2015, 07:26 AM
motopsycho87 motopsycho87 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Suffolk, UK
Posts: 905
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jakobi View Post
My 2010 engine and 2013 engines are setup very similarly in terms of cylinder height and head modification but run very differently with the same jetting and gearing.

I haven't mapped the cylinder ports, or compared pipe shape/volume to any extent, however one has a Kokusan CDI and the other a JDRacing Italian model (from memory). I wouldn't be surprised if they have different maps.

Also, TSP has been using programmable CDIs on the Ktm 2T ranges and finding significant gains in power across the rev range simply by tuning the ignition map. Something that's often overlooked I think.
How would you compare them?
__________________
2006 EC300 Enduro - Ignitech CDI - 38/NECW#2/165 FMF gnarly, FMF shorty, .50 front 5.7 rear

2016 RM-Z450
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-12-2015, 05:17 PM
Jakobi's Avatar
Jakobi Jakobi is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,994
Default

No idea how you'd actually find out what maps are being used in particular CDI units.

Seat of the pants may indicate some variances if testing both units on the same bike with no other changes, and some dyno time would confirm it.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-13-2015, 11:12 AM
motopsycho87 motopsycho87 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Suffolk, UK
Posts: 905
Default

You need an oscilloscope and signal generator, feed a signal that emulates the revs of the bike, supply the input with the required voltage, and measure the output on an oscilloscope... In other words, too much hassle!

There's a lot of info on how different advances and retards generate different power, but not a lot of info on whole curves and power at specific revs.

Was thinking about getting my bike up to a dyno and testing out the ec300, rm120 and sxs250 cdis.... Should I set up a PayPal fund? Lol
__________________
2006 EC300 Enduro - Ignitech CDI - 38/NECW#2/165 FMF gnarly, FMF shorty, .50 front 5.7 rear

2016 RM-Z450
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Seat options davedunaway General Discussions & Announcements 2 03-13-2014 10:11 AM
Seat options for 06 davedunaway Enduro Chassis & Body 0 02-04-2014 02:41 PM
Sub Mount options? farmerj Enduro Chassis & Body 18 03-15-2012 09:01 PM
I Need A new Gas Cap - Options? JP4 Enduro Chassis & Body 10 06-28-2011 01:59 PM
New hub options Nick Enduro Product Announcements 2 03-02-2008 10:29 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2009 - GasGasRider.org